Standards for public claims
- Do not publish fabricated people, credentials, testimonials, outcomes, ratings, or research.
- Do not present internal diagnostics as employer ATS results or universal thresholds.
- Explain the basis and limits of important product, data, and methodology claims.
- Separate examples from facts about a real candidate or employer.
- Use the MatchResume publisher name unless a real, attributable author or reviewer is identified.
Review, maintenance, and dates
A maintained date records the most recent substantive review of the page. It should change when meaning, methodology, product behavior, or important links are reviewed—not merely because a page was requested by a crawler.
Product pages should be revisited when the relevant workflow changes. Educational pages should be revisited when their linked methodology, limitations, or product references change.
Corrections and feedback
- 1
Report
Send the page URL and the specific concern through the contact form.
- 2
Review
Check the claim against product behavior, source material, and the applicable policy.
- 3
Correct
Update a material error or ambiguity and review connected pages when the issue may repeat.
Frequently asked questions
Does MatchResume use invented examples as customer results?
It should not. Illustrative copy must be labeled by context and must not be presented as a verified customer, testimonial, or outcome.
How can I report an error?
Use the contact form with the page URL and the exact statement that needs review.
Does a maintained date mean every sentence changed?
No. It indicates a substantive review or update of the page, not that every section was rewritten.
Continue with reliable context
About MatchResume
Product purpose and accountability.
Read the methodology
The analysis claims this policy governs.
Report a correction
Send a page-specific concern for review.
MatchResume public content should distinguish product behavior from general guidance, avoid unsupported statistics and hiring promises, name important limitations, and show a maintained date. Material factual errors should be corrected, and affected pages should be reviewed when the product workflow changes.